Centre Introduces Bill to Criminalise Disruption During ‘Vande Mataram’ Singing; Opposition Raises Objections in Rajya Sabha

The Union government on Friday introduced the Prevention of Insults to National Honour (Amendment) Bill, 2026 in the Rajya Sabha, proposing to make the deliberate disruption of or obstruction during the singing of Vande Mataram a punishable offence. The legislation was tabled by Union Minister Nityanand Rai amid continued protests by Opposition members over the NEET paper leak issue during the Monsoon Session.
If enacted, the amendment will expand the scope of the Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act, 1971, bringing under its ambit individuals who intentionally interrupt or prevent the singing of the national song or disturb gatherings where Vande Mataram is being performed.
The introduction of the Bill triggered objections from several Opposition parties. CPI MPs P. Sandosh Kumar and John Brittas opposed the legislation in the Upper House, arguing against its introduction.
John Brittas had earlier written to Union Home Minister Amit Shah, urging the Centre to reconsider the proposal. In his communication, he contended that the amendment departs from the constitutional understanding governing the status of the National Anthem and the National Song and sought its withdrawal.
The Bill also drew criticism from Aam Aadmi Party Rajya Sabha MP Sanjay Singh, who questioned the government's intent behind the move. He alleged that incidents involving disrespect towards the Tricolour and Vande Mataram had occurred from within the BJP's ranks and also raised questions about the party's historical role during India's freedom movement.
The BJP, however, defended the proposed legislation, maintaining that it aims to reinforce respect for the national song. Rajya Sabha MP Sanjay Seth said Vande Mataram occupies a special place in the country's history and added that its rendition has become increasingly widespread across the nation in recent years.
The Bill is expected to be taken up for further discussion during the ongoing Monsoon Session, where it is likely to witness intense debate between the treasury benches and the Opposition over its constitutional and legal implications.



