UGC-NET weightage in Ph.D. admissions draws supervisor criticism

Ph.D. supervisors have raised concerns over the weightage structure for admissions, arguing that the 70% emphasis on the UGC-NET examination combined with 30% from college interviews constrains universities' ability to differentiate among applicants.

Supervisors contend that the current formula reduces institutional discretion in selecting candidates, potentially disadvantaging those who perform well in interviews but score lower on the standardized test.

The criticism reflects broader debate over how entrance examinations and coaching-driven preparation influence Ph.D. selection processes across Indian universities.